Followers

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Pioneer Feminist of the New World


SOR JUANA INÉS DE LA CRUZ, PIONEER FEMINIST OF THE NEW WORLD

Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, whose original name is Juana Ramírez de Asbaje, was an outstanding seventeenth-century writer in what at the time was the Spanish colonial empire and is today the United Mexican States (popularly, Mexico).

Sor Juana is a notable figure of the Spanish Golden Age, which witnessed an efflorescence of the arts—literature, the visual arts, architecture, and music.

She has been described by Encyclopedia Britannica as “the last great writer of the Hispanic Baroque and the first great exemplar of colonial Mexican culture.”


—Stephanie Merrim, “Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz: Mexican Poet and Scholar,” Encyclopedia Britannica, August 1, 2017

Sor Juana has been chosen as one of the top ten greatest women poets because of her influence on the approximately 850 million people today who are the cultural offspring of Spain and the Spanish colonial empire.

She represents the rich, expansive culture and heritage of Spain and the colonies of the former Spanish Empire in Central and South America, and if we add up the various populations of this grouping of countries, excluding the 18 present-day U.S. states that were formerly Spanish, the total equals approximately 850 million.


Although Sor Juana was a highly accomplished poet in the Baroque style, it is not for this reason that she has been selected as one of the top ten greatest women poets. There are notables of the Baroque style, such as Miguel de Cervantes or Lope de Vega, who outshine Sor Juana.

Sor Juana has been selected because her influence extends beyond Hispanic culture and with newfound relevance. This postmodern period in the West, she is celebrated as an exemplar of nascent feminism. She is recognized as a pioneer feminist of the New World.

Feminism is a postmodern ideology of major and substantial influence today. It affects not only women but also men and, to speak broadly, all possible categories of gender. There are variants of this ideology so that it would be more accurate to cite feminisms (plural) rather than feminism (singular).

Feminism is defined by Lexico as “the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.”


More nuanced and especially revealing of the charged, conflictive meanings residing in the term is this discussion by Kathy Caprino in Forbes:


—Kathy Caprino, “What Is Feminism, and Why Do So Many Women and Men Hate It?” Forbes, March 8, 2017

“There are thousands who believe in equal rights but find ‘feminism’ a word and a movement that doesn’t align with their personal beliefs or values,” the author underscores.

We will examine Sor Juana’s “You Foolish Men,” illustrating the underlying feminism.

YOU FOOLISH MEN by Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz

You foolish men who lay
the guilt on women,
not seeing you’re the cause
of the very thing you blame;

if you invite their disdain
with measureless desire
why wish they well behave
if you incite to ill.

You fight their stubbornness,
then, weightily,
you say it was their lightness
when it was your guile.

In all your crazy shows
you act just like a child
who plays the bogeyman
of which he’s then afraid.

With foolish arrogance
you hope to find a Thais
in her you court, but a Lucretia
when you’ve possessed her.

What kind of mind is odder
than his who mists
a mirror and then complains
that it’s not clear.

Their favour and disdain
you hold in equal state,
if they mistreat, you complain,
you mock if they treat you well.

No woman wins esteem of you:
the most modest is ungrateful
if she refuses to admit you;
yet if she does, she’s loose.

You always are so foolish
your censure is unfair;
one you blame for cruelty
the other for being easy.

What must be her temper
who offends when she’s
ungrateful and wearies
when compliant?

But with the anger and the grief
that your pleasure tells
good luck to her who doesn’t love you
and you go on and complain.

Your lover’s moans give wings
to women’s liberty:
and having made them bad,
you want to find them good.

Who has embraced
the greater blame in passion?
She who, solicited, falls,
or he who, fallen, pleads?

Who is more to blame,
though either should do wrong?
She who sins for pay
or he who pays to sin?

Why be outraged at the guilt
that is of your own doing?
Have them as you make them
or make them what you will.

Leave off your wooing
and then, with greater cause,
you can blame the passion
of her who comes to court?

Patent is your arrogance
that fights with many weapons
since in promise and insistence
you join world, flesh, and devil.


The poem lists men’s faults, in synopsis, “You have contradictory expectations of us. You are the cause of the lapses you lay upon us.”

Structured as an argument, the opening salvo is the first stanza: “You foolish men who lay / the guilt on women, / not seeing you’re the cause / of the very thing you blame.”

The succeeding seven stanzas cite instances of the opening charge—you seek to court a Thais (Greek courtesan) but to marry a Lucretia (virtuous Roman noblewoman); you complain if women treat you badly but mock them if they treat you well; you say the modest woman is ungrateful, the one who entertains you, loose.

The eighth stanza restates the charge—“You are always so foolish / your censure is unfair,” after which the list resumes.

Throughout, the poem composes memorable antitheses—“having made them bad, / you want to find them good,” “Have them as you make them / or make them what you will.”

The last three stanzas wrap up with stinging reproaches—“in promise and insistence / you join world, flesh, and devil.”

Notably Baroque qualities of the poem include moralizing and satire.

When we consider that the poem was written in the context of Spanish patriarchal society, it becomes readily apparent that the poem is feminist. The poem is not simply an exposition about differences in the attitudes of the sexes. It is a poem of protest against the bullying male attitudes the poet encountered that denigrate and unfairly characterize women.

Sor Juana had to struggle with the limited opportunities available to the women of her time. Almost entirely self-educated, she entered a convent most likely because she had been born out of wedlock to a family that was not wealthy so that the nunnery presented the best option available for her to pursue her intellectual and literary avocation.

As explained by Encyclopedia Britannica:

“Convent life afforded Sor Juana her own apartment, time to study and write, and the opportunity to teach music and drama to the girls in Santa Paula’s school. She also functioned as the convent’s archivist and accountant. In her convent cell, Sor Juana amassed one of the largest private libraries in the New World, together with a collection of musical and scientific instruments. She was able to continue her contact with other scholars and powerful members of the court. The patronage of the viceroy and vicereine of New Spain, notably that of the marquis and marquise de la Laguna from 1680 to 1688, helped her maintain her exceptional freedom. They visited her, favoured her, and had her works published in Spain. For her part, Sor Juana, though cloistered, became the unofficial court poet in the 1680s. Her plays in verse, occasional poetry, commissioned religious services, and writings for state festivals all contributed magnificently to the world outside the convent.”


A great deal more can be said about this remarkable woman, but because this piece is a blog post we will be economical in our treatment.

One of Sor Juana’s most famous poems, “Love Opened a Mortal Wound,” wrestles with the subject of romantic love. Hewing to the stylistic conventions of the Baroque, its tightness, wit, vivid imagery, and lyrical flair speak to us from across the centuries as a period masterpiece of a virtuoso, who, not incidentally, is a woman.

LOVE OPENED A MORTAL WOUND by Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz

Love opened a mortal wound.
In agony, I worked the blade
to make it deeper. Please,
I begged, let death come quick.

Wild, distracted, sick,
I counted, counted
all the ways love hurt me.
One life, I thought—a thousand deaths.

Blow after blow, my heart
couldn't survive this beating.
Then—how can I explain it?

I came to my senses. I said,
Why do I suffer? What lover
ever had so much pleasure?


The poem ends cleverly and paradoxically—the mortal wound elicits matchless pleasure.

In our post-Freudian world, we suggest that the poem borders on the pornographic.

No wonder that upon the departure from Mexico of her aristocratic patrons, clerical authorities quickly moved to curtail her objectionably worldly pursuits. She was effectively silenced by the bishop of Puebla.

Today Sor Juana is celebrated as a Mexican hero and a Mexican cultural archetype.

She continues to influence modern and contemporary culture. Examples of her recent legacy include the following.

- Margaret Atwood composed “Sor Juana Works in the Garden,” publishing it in The Door (2007), a book of poetry.
- Helen Edmundson wrote a play based on Sor Juana’s life, “The Heresy of Love,” staged by the Royal Shakespeare Company in 2012.
- Google Doodle commemorated Sor Juana’s 366th birthday on November 12, 2017.

Her continuing influence bespeaks her singular literary stature.



Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz (1981) by Enrique Fernandez Criach

1 comment:

  1. Images of works of art are posted on this website according to principles of fair use, specifically, they are posted for the purposes of information, education, and especially, contemplation.

    The purpose of this blog is, among others, to advance knowledge and to create culture, for public benefit.

    The sculpture is located in Oeste Park, Madrid, Spain.

    Gonzalinho

    ReplyDelete